With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:15

With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?

This is direct evidence. No complicated thinking-about-it things to worry your tiny brains.

Your only defense against those claims is to yell “FAKE” or “CONSPIRACY”…but without any real reason why anyone would fake it - or what the conspiracists have to gain from this insanely difficult set of operations.

There’s a reason for that - it is literally, mathematically and geometrically impossible to do that other than on a sphere.

Did your siblings abuse you growing up? Not your parents, specifically your siblings, or other children in the household you were raised with.

To pick just two things:

We have several hundred people who flew to space and saw it with their own eyes.

Now - there is NO piece of so-called evidence that you can provide that I cannot disprove. Try it. Post a piece of so-called flat-earth evidence in comments below - and I can single-handedly disprove it.

My girlfriend lied and said she never gave oral until me. She was very skilled. I’m upset with her lying. Do I dump her?

No Flat Earther has EVER explained how a simple magnetic compass works in the southern hemisphere (or the region beyond the equatorial circle in their own maps).

No Flat Earther has EVER explained the motion of the Sun and Moon around their flat earth model that can explain sunrise and sunset times all around the world.

We have photos of the round earth taken by many hundreds of satellites - owned by many different governments AND by many companies AND (with “cubesats”) by kids in college.

If you get a chance to have sex with either Kajal Agarwal or Samantha, who would you choose and why?

So - there you go. Two disproofs that no flat earther can explain.

Just one person (like me) can provide at least two dozen disproofs of the Flat Earth - and at least another two dozen consequences that we’d EASILY be able to spot if the Earth was actually flat.

Because this “evidence” that you imagine simply doesn’t exist - and yet the amount of evidence (indeed PROOF) that it’s nonsense is an enormous mountain:

How does the media determine which statements made by President Trump to fact-check and which ones to not fact-check?